MIP 3.1, 3.2 As-Planned vs As-BuiltĀ
MIP 3.1, 3.2 As-Planned vs As-Built Delay Analysis Methods
A practical way to evaluate project performance is by comparing asā€‘built progress against the baseline critical path.
Key Insight: Recording start, finish, and duration variances for each critical activity provides clarity on where delays occur and why.
Remarks contextualize the numbers, linking them to real site conditions or disruptions.
Documented, clear and detailed project records are required to perform this type of delay analysis.
In this video, you will learn everything you need to know about the "MIP 3.1, 3.2 As-Planned vs As-Built" Delay Analysis Methods as per the AACE RP 29R-03
You will learn:
How to perform delay analysis using this method step-by-step
The advantages, disadvantages, uses and limitations of this method.
